How big are your hands? I've never even seen a mixer that was too cramped for me to adjust 2 adjacent EQ knobs at the same time.
I mean…a lot of recording consoles are laid out like the db2/4 (well, the EQ knobs)…but they're actually cramped and it matters. The db4 just looks laid out badly.
It's a great mixer…no question about it. But I just can't see spending that much money on something that ugly when there are other mixers I know I'd like better. If they'd laid it out right and given a real rotary option, that wouldn't be the case.
That part, I'd agree with…I wouldn't use anything else. But having owned a xone and basically ignored the filters the whole time, I'm not sure I'd use them either.
Revolutionary? How many mixers have had filters like that before? Unless I'm missing something, the number is "a lot."
What am I missing about it?
The MUSIC is what matters!
Everything else is _________
Certainly not on any I've owned. Yeah you can do it but it's awkward and you can't do it comfortably-I don't see any reason to dislike the staggered layout other than it looks different than a typical dj mixer- and I think it makes the DB4 look pretty cool. Using the filter mode EQ is a two handed job, to orient them vertically you would need a full inch of clearance between each knob to avoid peoples fingers from getting caught or touching and allow full control.
Also try a pmc-06, you can't adjust one knob at a time properly.
Last edited by Xonetacular; 02-17-2012 at 05:57 PM.
TSP 2 | Serato DJ | Live 8 | MBP (SSD + HDD) | AIAIA TMA-1 Fool's Gold Edition | 1200 Mk2s | MidiFighter | KRK RP5
Xone: DB4 | Pioneer CDJ-2000 Nexus
DJTT FAQ | Read my guide to AUDIO CABLES
Indeed, this way of mixing feels really natural to me. And the sound is so smooth !
On my previous Xone mixers i used the filters a lot; but with this way with the hi and low together; it's just so good.
yeah, it's not the normal filters but the one you use wen switched the EQ mode to filter mode (both the DB2 as the DB4).
Kontrol X1MK2 <3
It was an Ecler Evo 5 (yeah I'm spoiled)... but you can do it with any midi mixer, from the DX to the DDM4000 if you want.
-- and yeah to confirm what others said in response to mostapha, I don't know another mixer outside of the DBs that allow filter mixing in this manner. It's not just having filters; it's being able to actually mix with the filters -- adjusting HP and LP and RES when you need to, on each channel, in the mix. Rather than sweeping one direction or another with whatever resonance value you set earlier. You have to try it for a while to get your head around it but it's actually really focused in terms of sound. And I can't explain why because I'm not a sound engineer but for me it's very different (and much "tighter") from adjusting bass/mid/treb with the knobs.
Last edited by djproben; 02-18-2012 at 03:45 AM.
"Art is what you can get away with." - Marshall McLuhan
The xone 92 has filters that you can kinda use like that, and the pmc cx has them per channel, though without resonance.
And I had my vcm600 mappd to be able to do it with ableton a while ago, before the db4, so I guess I'm just not that impressed. But I also don't use EQs much at all anymore and generally have grown to hate the sound of filters in DJ sets.
I'm not knocking it. I just don't think it's revolutionary in any way. It's a very slight improvement on something I think they already drove into the ground. But, again, I basically just use my EQs because they sound phasey...which kinda sounds cool on vocals. I don't use them to mix, and I doubt that would change with a db4. I could be wrong, though.
Trust me, being able to adjust the resonance on the fly makes a BIG difference. As does being able to adjust both HP and LP on two different tracks at the same time. You just have to try it to see what it feels like -- maybe it's just not for you. And OK, maybe "revolutionary" is an exaggeration, but you are like the king of exaggeration, so I don't feel too bad about that
"Art is what you can get away with." - Marshall McLuhan
|
Bookmarks