<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Key Analysis Software Smackdown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.djtechtools.com/2009/11/02/key-analysis-software-smackdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2009/11/02/key-analysis-software-smackdown/</link>
	<description>A complete recource for digital dj&#039;s and performers that use digital technology including controllerism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:38:27 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2009/11/02/key-analysis-software-smackdown/comment-page-2/#comment-28338</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=3105#comment-28338</guid>
		<description>Working out the keys manually is always the best solution as long as you have the time and music education required to do so.  Most Americans, however, never learned to play an instrument, much less learned the music theory necessary to accurately key music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Working out the keys manually is always the best solution as long as you have the time and music education required to do so.  Most Americans, however, never learned to play an instrument, much less learned the music theory necessary to accurately key music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2009/11/02/key-analysis-software-smackdown/comment-page-2/#comment-28238</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=3105#comment-28238</guid>
		<description>I recommend working out keys manually - at the piano/synth/vst! If you do it every time you get new music it doesn&#039;t take TOO long, and it&#039;s the safest method. Always works for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend working out keys manually &#8211; at the piano/synth/vst! If you do it every time you get new music it doesn&#8217;t take TOO long, and it&#8217;s the safest method. Always works for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wikkid1</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2009/11/02/key-analysis-software-smackdown/comment-page-2/#comment-27885</link>
		<dc:creator>wikkid1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 06:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=3105#comment-27885</guid>
		<description>i realize that this article isnt exactly fresh, but since ive been messing around with harmonic mixing lately i felt that i should leave a comment.

RE2 - the biggest, and pretty much the only, plus of this program is that its completely free.  which is also its biggest minus, being free its not as polished as some of the paid programs. expect extremely slow performance while scanning and frequent crashes.

MIK - much &quot;cleaner&quot; and lighter then RE2. but instead of being the premium solution this programs&#039; &quot;anti-piracy&quot; protection really hurts the legitimate users. Mixed in Key WILL NOT detect keys unless youre connect to the internet. so dont even consider detecting key during a set, unless youve got a separate laptop to do it on.

MMF - expensive as hell!! also in my opinion 99% useless for a DJ who plays live sets, to me this software is geared more towards the bedroom DJs who set up their set to burn on cd to be enjoyed later, regarding the key detection, its nothing special.

my recommendation to anybody trying to get into harmonic mixing, try RE2 first simply because its free... if that doesnt work out i hope youre using Virtual DJ as your DJing tool, since VDJ can also scan for keys, and it will display either the classic or the camelot notation.  im very VERY surprised that VDJ was not mentioned as part of this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i realize that this article isnt exactly fresh, but since ive been messing around with harmonic mixing lately i felt that i should leave a comment.</p>
<p>RE2 &#8211; the biggest, and pretty much the only, plus of this program is that its completely free.  which is also its biggest minus, being free its not as polished as some of the paid programs. expect extremely slow performance while scanning and frequent crashes.</p>
<p>MIK &#8211; much &#8220;cleaner&#8221; and lighter then RE2. but instead of being the premium solution this programs&#8217; &#8220;anti-piracy&#8221; protection really hurts the legitimate users. Mixed in Key WILL NOT detect keys unless youre connect to the internet. so dont even consider detecting key during a set, unless youve got a separate laptop to do it on.</p>
<p>MMF &#8211; expensive as hell!! also in my opinion 99% useless for a DJ who plays live sets, to me this software is geared more towards the bedroom DJs who set up their set to burn on cd to be enjoyed later, regarding the key detection, its nothing special.</p>
<p>my recommendation to anybody trying to get into harmonic mixing, try RE2 first simply because its free&#8230; if that doesnt work out i hope youre using Virtual DJ as your DJing tool, since VDJ can also scan for keys, and it will display either the classic or the camelot notation.  im very VERY surprised that VDJ was not mentioned as part of this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barghy</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2009/11/02/key-analysis-software-smackdown/comment-page-2/#comment-27633</link>
		<dc:creator>Barghy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=3105#comment-27633</guid>
		<description>I think the more accurate review would have been to see how they compared when mixing. I for one don&#039;t care if it gets everything consistently wrong as long as when it comes to the mix everything is in harmony. After all the sound is the only thing that matter so who cares if it doesn&#039;t detect the perfect key.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the more accurate review would have been to see how they compared when mixing. I for one don&#8217;t care if it gets everything consistently wrong as long as when it comes to the mix everything is in harmony. After all the sound is the only thing that matter so who cares if it doesn&#8217;t detect the perfect key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonsafer</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2009/11/02/key-analysis-software-smackdown/comment-page-2/#comment-26852</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonsafer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=3105#comment-26852</guid>
		<description>Jeremy Espinosa:
[quote comment=&quot;26707&quot;]It is obvious that detection software, without having all the individual elements of a mixed track, will never be perfect.  The new version of Melodyne has the same problem with its new Direct Note Access feature for editing polyphonic notes.  Some songs will always detect better than others.  Melodyne is a $300 program.[/quote]

Mixed in key is a $58 program. Rapid Evolution is a 0$ program.

They both do the same thing with the same results.

Eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy Espinosa:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.djtechtools.com/2009/11/02/key-analysis-software-smackdown/#comment-26707"><p>
It is obvious that detection software, without having all the individual elements of a mixed track, will never be perfect.  The new version of Melodyne has the same problem with its new Direct Note Access feature for editing polyphonic notes.  Some songs will always detect better than others.  Melodyne is a $300 program.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Mixed in key is a $58 program. Rapid Evolution is a 0$ program.</p>
<p>They both do the same thing with the same results.</p>
<p>Eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Espinosa</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2009/11/02/key-analysis-software-smackdown/comment-page-2/#comment-26707</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Espinosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=3105#comment-26707</guid>
		<description>I read every single comment on this article and wanted to give my 2 cents.  It is obvious that detection software, without having all the individual elements of a mixed track, will never be perfect.  The new version of Melodyne has the same problem with its new Direct Note Access feature for editing polyphonic notes.  Some songs will always detect better than others.  Melodyne is a $300 program.

Having said that, I&#039;m a Mixed in Key user since version 1.  I have been very satisfied especially since I am entitled to lifetime updates.  I&#039;m very glad I spent the money and even if I didn&#039;t receive the free updates I would pay to upgrade each version.

I think those that have their own system of accurately keying their tracks are lucky and don&#039;t need this product.  But for those of us that are not musically trained and were good DJs before they found this product, this will only take your mixing to the next level.

I found that mixing two House tracks out of key does not always sound bad.  I will occasionally jump around the Camelot wheel just because I think a certain track will be a real crowd pleaser at that time.  But having a program like this will immediately increase the possibilities of longer blends and some really amazing mixes.  I still on occasion will change my mind on a track because when cueing in my headphones it does not sound good.  But this happens a whole lot less than before I was using Mixed in Key.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read every single comment on this article and wanted to give my 2 cents.  It is obvious that detection software, without having all the individual elements of a mixed track, will never be perfect.  The new version of Melodyne has the same problem with its new Direct Note Access feature for editing polyphonic notes.  Some songs will always detect better than others.  Melodyne is a $300 program.</p>
<p>Having said that, I&#8217;m a Mixed in Key user since version 1.  I have been very satisfied especially since I am entitled to lifetime updates.  I&#8217;m very glad I spent the money and even if I didn&#8217;t receive the free updates I would pay to upgrade each version.</p>
<p>I think those that have their own system of accurately keying their tracks are lucky and don&#8217;t need this product.  But for those of us that are not musically trained and were good DJs before they found this product, this will only take your mixing to the next level.</p>
<p>I found that mixing two House tracks out of key does not always sound bad.  I will occasionally jump around the Camelot wheel just because I think a certain track will be a real crowd pleaser at that time.  But having a program like this will immediately increase the possibilities of longer blends and some really amazing mixes.  I still on occasion will change my mind on a track because when cueing in my headphones it does not sound good.  But this happens a whole lot less than before I was using Mixed in Key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Tech Tools review on key analysis &#171; tladb</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2009/11/02/key-analysis-software-smackdown/comment-page-2/#comment-26357</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Tech Tools review on key analysis &#171; tladb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=3105#comment-26357</guid>
		<description>[...] DJ Tech Tools review on key&#160;analysis  21 January 2010 tladb Leave a comment Go to comments    Key Analysis Software Smackdown [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DJ Tech Tools review on key&nbsp;analysis  21 January 2010 tladb Leave a comment Go to comments    Key Analysis Software Smackdown [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2009/11/02/key-analysis-software-smackdown/comment-page-2/#comment-25853</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=3105#comment-25853</guid>
		<description>Jerry:  How does key detection software &quot;take the musicianship from djing&quot;?  Most American youth have very limited music education since schools started dropping &quot;Art&quot; courses due to budget cuts in the 1980&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry:  How does key detection software &#8220;take the musicianship from djing&#8221;?  Most American youth have very limited music education since schools started dropping &#8220;Art&#8221; courses due to budget cuts in the 1980&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
