<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Djing Heats Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/10/17/digital-djing-heats-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/10/17/digital-djing-heats-up/</link>
	<description>A Complete Resource for Digital DJ Information and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ TechTools &#160;&#124;&#160; Messe Fever</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/10/17/digital-djing-heats-up/comment-page-1/#comment-46259</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ TechTools &#160;&#124;&#160; Messe Fever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=852#comment-46259</guid>
		<description>[...] could also have something up their sleeve. Finally, don&#8217;t forget that both of these companies announced they are working together late last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] could also have something up their sleeve. Finally, don&#8217;t forget that both of these companies announced they are working together late last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dj Montenegro</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/10/17/digital-djing-heats-up/comment-page-1/#comment-26030</link>
		<dc:creator>Dj Montenegro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=852#comment-26030</guid>
		<description>*
1. Simplicity
2. Functionality
3. Stability and quality of work
4. A presentable external image midi the interface (the professional technics should not look as a New Year tree where a heap of names and advertising, to users do not pay for that that they are engaged in advertising of a product of the company, therefore the price for the device should be hardly above than the budgetary version of the equipment under Ableton)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*<br />
1. Simplicity<br />
2. Functionality<br />
3. Stability and quality of work<br />
4. A presentable external image midi the interface (the professional technics should not look as a New Year tree where a heap of names and advertising, to users do not pay for that that they are engaged in advertising of a product of the company, therefore the price for the device should be hardly above than the budgetary version of the equipment under Ableton)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dj Montenegro</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/10/17/digital-djing-heats-up/comment-page-1/#comment-26029</link>
		<dc:creator>Dj Montenegro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=852#comment-26029</guid>
		<description>For a long time already has come it is time to make the union of these giants. I prefer Serato because there there is nothing superfluous, the pleasant not loaded interface, in it it is convenient to play, Ableton will give multifunctionality and more possibilities for creative growth and quality of game, and Traktor is begun too to whirl by the superfluous information, it is easy that or to break and then long to search for the reason, and in Serato all is simple and easy, near at hand all that is necessary)))
To everyone the))) I for Serato and Ableton)))))))))))
Good blog! It likely have specially written what to understand for this purpose what to do, and as to that prefer and why)))) That&#039;s all more... And at whom to ask as not DJs which use these units)))
1. Simplicity
2. Functionality
3. Stability and quality of work
4. Presentable appearance midi the interface (the professional technics should not look as a New Year tree where a heap of names and advertising, ??? to users do not pay for that that they are engaged in advertising of a product of the company, therefore the price for the device should be hardly above than the budgetary version of the equipment under Ableton)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a long time already has come it is time to make the union of these giants. I prefer Serato because there there is nothing superfluous, the pleasant not loaded interface, in it it is convenient to play, Ableton will give multifunctionality and more possibilities for creative growth and quality of game, and Traktor is begun too to whirl by the superfluous information, it is easy that or to break and then long to search for the reason, and in Serato all is simple and easy, near at hand all that is necessary)))<br />
To everyone the))) I for Serato and Ableton))))))))))) </p>
<p>Good blog! It likely have specially written what to understand for this purpose what to do, and as to that prefer and why)))) That&#8217;s all more&#8230; And at whom to ask as not DJs which use these units))) </p>
<p>1. Simplicity<br />
2. Functionality<br />
3. Stability and quality of work<br />
4. Presentable appearance midi the interface (the professional technics should not look as a New Year tree where a heap of names and advertising, ??? to users do not pay for that that they are engaged in advertising of a product of the company, therefore the price for the device should be hardly above than the budgetary version of the equipment under Ableton)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Van Draken</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/10/17/digital-djing-heats-up/comment-page-1/#comment-26004</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Van Draken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=852#comment-26004</guid>
		<description>Traktor is still my favorite, although I wish it would offer a couple more options that Serato and Ableton do.  Waveform display options suit my liking better in Serato Scratch, and it might be neat if Traktor had an auto bar-matching option, such as Ableton.  Either way, I am definitely interested to see what Ableton and Serato put together!  This topic inspires me to write a blog entry.  If interested, click the link in my name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traktor is still my favorite, although I wish it would offer a couple more options that Serato and Ableton do.  Waveform display options suit my liking better in Serato Scratch, and it might be neat if Traktor had an auto bar-matching option, such as Ableton.  Either way, I am definitely interested to see what Ableton and Serato put together!  This topic inspires me to write a blog entry.  If interested, click the link in my name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyronnster</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/10/17/digital-djing-heats-up/comment-page-1/#comment-25997</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyronnster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=852#comment-25997</guid>
		<description>I am interested to see it working but more than happy with my traktor an ableton set up thanx to the guide that I found on here,
More than happy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested to see it working but more than happy with my traktor an ableton set up thanx to the guide that I found on here,</p>
<p>More than happy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djtechtools.com</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/10/17/digital-djing-heats-up/comment-page-1/#comment-25982</link>
		<dc:creator>djtechtools.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=852#comment-25982</guid>
		<description>[...] and finally take a peek at some of the big announcements from last year including the mysterious Ableton/Serato joint venture. Dj TechTools will be your NAMM headquarters for the next 4 days with a solid team of reporters in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and finally take a peek at some of the big announcements from last year including the mysterious Ableton/Serato joint venture. Dj TechTools will be your NAMM headquarters for the next 4 days with a solid team of reporters in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital &#60;b&#62;Djing&#60;/b&#62; Heats Up at djtechtools.com &#124; Dance Lounge</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/10/17/digital-djing-heats-up/comment-page-1/#comment-14769</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital &#60;b&#62;Djing&#60;/b&#62; Heats Up at djtechtools.com &#124; Dance Lounge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 08:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=852#comment-14769</guid>
		<description>[...] Source:Digital &lt;b&gt;Djing&lt;/b&gt; Heats Up at djtechtools.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source:Digital &lt;b&gt;Djing&lt;/b&gt; Heats Up at djtechtools.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holy Shit! SERATO &#38; ABLETON Merger &#124; Fixpatrix.com. It really whips the lama's ass!</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/10/17/digital-djing-heats-up/comment-page-1/#comment-14726</link>
		<dc:creator>Holy Shit! SERATO &#38; ABLETON Merger &#124; Fixpatrix.com. It really whips the lama's ass!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=852#comment-14726</guid>
		<description>[...] more here Filed under: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here Filed under: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

