<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The biggest development in recorded music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/03/26/the-biggest-development-in-recorded-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/03/26/the-biggest-development-in-recorded-music/</link>
	<description>A complete recource for digital dj's and performers that use digital technology including controllerism</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: signaturex</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/03/26/the-biggest-development-in-recorded-music/#comment-3143</link>
		<dc:creator>signaturex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 12:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=285#comment-3143</guid>
		<description>I looked over all the celemony stuff and it looks like they are working on a system like this. Its supposed to release later this year. 

My take on it is an actual dynamics analyzer and effector that first analyzes the tracks dynamics and sonic qualities and then writes those attributes to a  file that is parralell to the audio.  Like the stripe  in traktor or abletons helper files.  

The dynamics block contains user defined systems to  write the attributes at various rates and levels of detail. So basically its re-writeing the audio waveform but in descriptions of how it deals with the audio .  For instance a multi-band key analysis  could be written to the dynamics file.  For obvious reasons.  How this information is analyzed is up to the user because the user sets up band definition with groups of eqs and crossovers to define the parts of the song.  Gain is another quality that could be defined at this time.   I think you can see how this pans out.  The analyzation is set-up for the audio to be played more efficiently by virtul 'equipment' that uses the pre-ananlysis information to make decisions--because the analysis is defined by the user it is very customizable and so there for the behavior of the processing. 

I have thought that once this other information starts developing midi is the obvious next description to take place.  the audio and the dynamics analyzation can create midi events and also be output as different streams of midi that describe the user's wishes for the processing of the audio. 

This would necssitate the available of a midi system inside the program that deleivers events to whatever modules the user defines.  In a simple example in traktor there might be a situation where  a certain audio dynamic, key, or user defined midi event(cue) creates a string of dynamics adjustments in another module.  Like the bass becomes stronger in one channel and the dynamics are adjusted in another channel.   This seems like alot of set-up and complication just to switch the basses in a mix.  But .. once this language developes in the user and interface I can see the system developed where the langauge is copied and pasted between songs and arrangements.  A similar example of this might be the clip envelopes in Ableton and how you can manipulate two pieces of audio with the same set of directions.  this is, however, different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked over all the celemony stuff and it looks like they are working on a system like this. Its supposed to release later this year. </p>
<p>My take on it is an actual dynamics analyzer and effector that first analyzes the tracks dynamics and sonic qualities and then writes those attributes to a  file that is parralell to the audio.  Like the stripe  in traktor or abletons helper files.  </p>
<p>The dynamics block contains user defined systems to  write the attributes at various rates and levels of detail. So basically its re-writeing the audio waveform but in descriptions of how it deals with the audio .  For instance a multi-band key analysis  could be written to the dynamics file.  For obvious reasons.  How this information is analyzed is up to the user because the user sets up band definition with groups of eqs and crossovers to define the parts of the song.  Gain is another quality that could be defined at this time.   I think you can see how this pans out.  The analyzation is set-up for the audio to be played more efficiently by virtul &#8216;equipment&#8217; that uses the pre-ananlysis information to make decisions&#8211;because the analysis is defined by the user it is very customizable and so there for the behavior of the processing. </p>
<p>I have thought that once this other information starts developing midi is the obvious next description to take place.  the audio and the dynamics analyzation can create midi events and also be output as different streams of midi that describe the user&#8217;s wishes for the processing of the audio. </p>
<p>This would necssitate the available of a midi system inside the program that deleivers events to whatever modules the user defines.  In a simple example in traktor there might be a situation where  a certain audio dynamic, key, or user defined midi event(cue) creates a string of dynamics adjustments in another module.  Like the bass becomes stronger in one channel and the dynamics are adjusted in another channel.   This seems like alot of set-up and complication just to switch the basses in a mix.  But .. once this language developes in the user and interface I can see the system developed where the langauge is copied and pasted between songs and arrangements.  A similar example of this might be the clip envelopes in Ableton and how you can manipulate two pieces of audio with the same set of directions.  this is, however, different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ean Golden</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/03/26/the-biggest-development-in-recorded-music/#comment-2770</link>
		<dc:creator>Ean Golden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=285#comment-2770</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite="#comment-2759"&gt; These would really re-invent the song on an auditory level and there would be no actual sample to tie source material to actual output. Is there a system that does this already?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

sounds awesome to me! I am not aware of anything that does that but it would be great or triggering synths in ableton live and remixing tracks on the fly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#comment-2759"><p> These would really re-invent the song on an auditory level and there would be no actual sample to tie source material to actual output. Is there a system that does this already?</p></blockquote>
<p>sounds awesome to me! I am not aware of anything that does that but it would be great or triggering synths in ableton live and remixing tracks on the fly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: signaturex</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/03/26/the-biggest-development-in-recorded-music/#comment-2759</link>
		<dc:creator>signaturex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=285#comment-2759</guid>
		<description>" Imagine this scenario: ?No Mr. Copyright protection manager, I did not sample the bass line from Queen- I simply replayed it to sound exactly like the original.? In a world where the recordings around us are increasingly becoming our notes of choice this may take your collective compositions to the next level."

I agree ... this possability does exist .. but a sample is still a sample even if its warped or not.  Ive been toying with the ideas of a dynamics block and analyzer that outputs midi.  It would work on some of the same principles as this.  I also have been using the pyrolator midi device to create midi from an audio signal.  In such a scenario the audio recording could be seperated as with this software and then analyzed by a device that outputs midi to a synthesizer set-up.  These wouild really re-invent the song on an auditorey level and there would be no actual sample to tie source material to actual output. Is there a system that does this already?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Imagine this scenario: ?No Mr. Copyright protection manager, I did not sample the bass line from Queen- I simply replayed it to sound exactly like the original.? In a world where the recordings around us are increasingly becoming our notes of choice this may take your collective compositions to the next level.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree &#8230; this possability does exist .. but a sample is still a sample even if its warped or not.  Ive been toying with the ideas of a dynamics block and analyzer that outputs midi.  It would work on some of the same principles as this.  I also have been using the pyrolator midi device to create midi from an audio signal.  In such a scenario the audio recording could be seperated as with this software and then analyzed by a device that outputs midi to a synthesizer set-up.  These wouild really re-invent the song on an auditorey level and there would be no actual sample to tie source material to actual output. Is there a system that does this already?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAWSpitau</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/03/26/the-biggest-development-in-recorded-music/#comment-2615</link>
		<dc:creator>MAWSpitau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=285#comment-2615</guid>
		<description>This piece of software seems to be great!! I have written about it a few days ago! http://www.housetunez.de/2008/03/13/soundfiles-bearbeiten-wie-noch-nie-audio-wie-midi-bearbeiten/
The possibilities are unlimited and it would be fun to have this implemented in DJ-Software... Damn hot :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This piece of software seems to be great!! I have written about it a few days ago! <a href="http://www.housetunez.de/2008/03/13/soundfiles-bearbeiten-wie-noch-nie-audio-wie-midi-bearbeiten/" rel="nofollow">http://www.housetunez.de/2008/03/13/soundfiles-bearbeiten-wie-noch-nie-audio-wie-midi-bearbeiten/</a><br />
The possibilities are unlimited and it would be fun to have this implemented in DJ-Software&#8230; Damn hot :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosta</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/03/26/the-biggest-development-in-recorded-music/#comment-2571</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=285#comment-2571</guid>
		<description>@H20 


GET ON THE CRACK 


:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@H20 </p>
<p>GET ON THE CRACK </p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny Pez</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/03/26/the-biggest-development-in-recorded-music/#comment-2565</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny Pez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=285#comment-2565</guid>
		<description>This is a remixer's dream! I not really sure how he was able to change things with a keyboard... seems like you would need a mouse to select the notes you want to manipulate... but imagine taking a piece of music and transforming it to something new for your sets.  Incredible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a remixer&#8217;s dream! I not really sure how he was able to change things with a keyboard&#8230; seems like you would need a mouse to select the notes you want to manipulate&#8230; but imagine taking a piece of music and transforming it to something new for your sets.  Incredible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiskers</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/03/26/the-biggest-development-in-recorded-music/#comment-2549</link>
		<dc:creator>whiskers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=285#comment-2549</guid>
		<description>I finally got around to watching the video, and, wow, that looks amazing. So many possibilities!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally got around to watching the video, and, wow, that looks amazing. So many possibilities!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris combe</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/03/26/the-biggest-development-in-recorded-music/#comment-2493</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris combe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=285#comment-2493</guid>
		<description>i think this will really create some awesome possibilities in the world of remixes.. imagine how easy it will be to lift vocals from a track or just the bass line.. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think this will really create some awesome possibilities in the world of remixes.. imagine how easy it will be to lift vocals from a track or just the bass line.. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.398 seconds -->
