<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Blame the Suits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/01/25/dont-blame-the-suits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/01/25/dont-blame-the-suits/</link>
	<description>A complete recource for digital dj's and performers that use digital technology including controllerism</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ean Golden</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/01/25/dont-blame-the-suits/#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator>Ean Golden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=176#comment-1095</guid>
		<description>Sure past performance is a good indicator of product quality but lets be careful to not trash products without using them. So, just to be sure its crap- we ordered one :-) Who knows, what if its cool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure past performance is a good indicator of product quality but lets be careful to not trash products without using them. So, just to be sure its crap- we ordered one :-) Who knows, what if its cool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillaume Brandeburg</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/01/25/dont-blame-the-suits/#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator>Guillaume Brandeburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=176#comment-1094</guid>
		<description>Reloop? That OEM crap?

You cannot be serious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reloop? That OEM crap?</p>
<p>You cannot be serious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Average Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/01/25/dont-blame-the-suits/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Average Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=176#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>have u guys seen this

http://www.reloopdj.com/shop_content.php/coID/12/content/Reloop-Digital-Jockey/language/en/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have u guys seen this</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reloopdj.com/shop_content.php/coID/12/content/Reloop-Digital-Jockey/language/en/" rel="nofollow">http://www.reloopdj.com/shop_content.php/coID/12/content/Reloop-Digital-Jockey/language/en/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dudu P</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/01/25/dont-blame-the-suits/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Dudu P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=176#comment-592</guid>
		<description>There's no need for platters. I would love a VCI-100 which traded the platters for a full fledged MK2 pitch fader. 

Pitch precision is everything I'll ever need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no need for platters. I would love a VCI-100 which traded the platters for a full fledged MK2 pitch fader. </p>
<p>Pitch precision is everything I&#8217;ll ever need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Settle</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/01/25/dont-blame-the-suits/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Settle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=176#comment-538</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite="#comment-517"&gt;
No one company has made the "STANDARD" yet.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I doubt that one company will make the standard in this rapidly evolving technology driven industry. Technics became the standard by accident - not a DJ deck but was the best around for a very long time thus became the standard. Pioneer CDJs came out with a killer product before anyone else (not strictly true but you know what I mean) thus they own the CD deck market (helped by giving so many away to big clubs of course). And Serato came out with Scratch Live at a time when the competition was largely floundering in a sea of bugs and bad performance. Although, calling Serato the standard in the DVS market may well change as more products come out.

But for controllers, there are so many around now from little Faderfoxes to full on jog wheel free Ableton controllers. And just when we though the market would settle at VCI/Total Control style all in one jog wheel jobbies, out comes the NS7, Stanton's SC system, Otus and ITCH just to confuse us even more. And let's not forget regulars CD and digital media decks becomeing MIDI mappable as well. 

So my feeling is that with technology moving so quickly and to a degree shooting off in different directions, there won't be a standard, but just stand out products in a wide and varied market full of controllers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/01/25/dont-blame-the-suits/#comment-"><p>
No one company has made the &#8220;STANDARD&#8221; yet.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I doubt that one company will make the standard in this rapidly evolving technology driven industry. Technics became the standard by accident - not a DJ deck but was the best around for a very long time thus became the standard. Pioneer CDJs came out with a killer product before anyone else (not strictly true but you know what I mean) thus they own the CD deck market (helped by giving so many away to big clubs of course). And Serato came out with Scratch Live at a time when the competition was largely floundering in a sea of bugs and bad performance. Although, calling Serato the standard in the DVS market may well change as more products come out.</p>
<p>But for controllers, there are so many around now from little Faderfoxes to full on jog wheel free Ableton controllers. And just when we though the market would settle at VCI/Total Control style all in one jog wheel jobbies, out comes the NS7, Stanton&#8217;s SC system, Otus and ITCH just to confuse us even more. And let&#8217;s not forget regulars CD and digital media decks becomeing MIDI mappable as well. </p>
<p>So my feeling is that with technology moving so quickly and to a degree shooting off in different directions, there won&#8217;t be a standard, but just stand out products in a wide and varied market full of controllers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tobamai</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/01/25/dont-blame-the-suits/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>tobamai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 03:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=176#comment-536</guid>
		<description>One thing I failed to really express: I like having the deck controls seperate from the mixer. I tried to get at that point with "all-in-one", but it didn't quite come across.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I failed to really express: I like having the deck controls seperate from the mixer. I tried to get at that point with &#8220;all-in-one&#8221;, but it didn&#8217;t quite come across.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tobamai</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/01/25/dont-blame-the-suits/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>tobamai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 03:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=176#comment-535</guid>
		<description>I really like Stanton's approach to the problem of midi controllers by making modules. I don't like the vci-100 because I don't want an "all in one" box.

I'd much rather have my laptop, a dedicated audio interface, a midi mixer (or an analogue mixer), and a couple of control surfaces (either analogue decks or midi decks). The largest benefits being that I don't have to stick to one manufacturer (at least, if they're all midi compatible) and I can pick out the features and functionality that I like for each unit. 

I hate seeing built in sound cards on midi control surfaces. I have an audio interface already and I like it. If I want to upgrade it I have my sights set on a different box already. If I like the control surface, why would I want to pay for the onboard sound card I won't use too?

Just my thoughts ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like Stanton&#8217;s approach to the problem of midi controllers by making modules. I don&#8217;t like the vci-100 because I don&#8217;t want an &#8220;all in one&#8221; box.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d much rather have my laptop, a dedicated audio interface, a midi mixer (or an analogue mixer), and a couple of control surfaces (either analogue decks or midi decks). The largest benefits being that I don&#8217;t have to stick to one manufacturer (at least, if they&#8217;re all midi compatible) and I can pick out the features and functionality that I like for each unit. </p>
<p>I hate seeing built in sound cards on midi control surfaces. I have an audio interface already and I like it. If I want to upgrade it I have my sights set on a different box already. If I like the control surface, why would I want to pay for the onboard sound card I won&#8217;t use too?</p>
<p>Just my thoughts ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fatlimey</title>
		<link>http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/01/25/dont-blame-the-suits/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Fatlimey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.djtechtools.com/?p=176#comment-533</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite="#comment-530"&gt;There is one specific question I have for you guys. Besides scratching (if I could show you a way to more effectively pitch bend) is there any reason anyone needs a platter anymore?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Jog and Shuttle, getting around unmarked-up tracks mouse free to find those precise points for dropping a cue. Once the track is marked up with cue points, selecting them by next/prev is good enough, plus allowing 4/8/16 beat jumps forward or backwards from that point is great for hitting those phrases, breakdowns and high points in perfect sync. (Beatjump is a wonderful tool in Traktor to cover up your mistakes!)

All these operations are best done using incr/decr keys as they work on fixed units of time. The Platter allows analog control of position, time or a controller value - something that can mostly be done with a knob. I still want a platter for scanning through tracks at markup time (which can happen during performance if someone hands you a track on a USB stick), but I probably wouldn't use it live. That's my style anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="http://www.djtechtools.com/2008/01/25/dont-blame-the-suits/#comment-"><p>There is one specific question I have for you guys. Besides scratching (if I could show you a way to more effectively pitch bend) is there any reason anyone needs a platter anymore?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Jog and Shuttle, getting around unmarked-up tracks mouse free to find those precise points for dropping a cue. Once the track is marked up with cue points, selecting them by next/prev is good enough, plus allowing 4/8/16 beat jumps forward or backwards from that point is great for hitting those phrases, breakdowns and high points in perfect sync. (Beatjump is a wonderful tool in Traktor to cover up your mistakes!)</p>
<p>All these operations are best done using incr/decr keys as they work on fixed units of time. The Platter allows analog control of position, time or a controller value - something that can mostly be done with a knob. I still want a platter for scanning through tracks at markup time (which can happen during performance if someone hands you a track on a USB stick), but I probably wouldn&#8217;t use it live. That&#8217;s my style anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
